An excellent review of scientific literature was published in the March 2001
issue of ARPAS dealing with control measures of shiga-like toxin-producing Escherichia
coli (including 0157:H7) to assure beef safety. The review dealt with
several factors related to this issue including the incidence and pre- and
post-harvest control measures.
The point of this article is to highlight the factors emphasized in the
review that cattlemen can manage during the production phase. As cattle
producers, we cannot do very much about post-harvest control measures. But, we
can implement management techniques that help reduce the incidence of E. coli
0157:H7 infection in live animals and do our part in providing a safe and
wholesome food product to the consuming public.
Cattle are a transient carrier of E. coli 0157:H7
Control measures during the production phase:
 | Manure application to pastures has been associated with infection of E.
coli 0157:H7 in grazing cattle. Consumption of ruminant manure is a key
risk factor for infection.
 | E. coli 0157:H7 has a high tolerance to a variety of
environmental conditions. |
 | E. coli 0157:H7 incubated at low or high temperatures are still
capable of producing toxins. |
 | E. coli 0157:H7 has survived –20 C (-4 F)in cattle feces and 4C
(39 F) in sheep feces for at least 100 days. E. coli 0157:H7
incubated at 5, 22, and 37 C (41, 72, and 99 F, respectively) survived for
70, 56, and 49 days, respectively. |
 | E. coli 0157:H7 has survived in a manure pile under fluctuating
environmental conditions for 21 months. |
 | Appropriate manure handling is critically important to minimize the
spread of E. coli 0157:H7. Extended periods between manure
application and grazing or harvesting forage is recommended. (CLW
editorial: Or eliminate manure application on pastures and incorporate
manure into soil used for forage production.) |
|
 | Drinking water has been a common source of contamination.
 | Because cattle consume large quantities of water at a time, infrequent
cleaning of water troughs can promote E. coli 0157:H7 reinfection. |
|
 | No evidence exists to suggest that E. coli 0157:H7 has acquired
resistance to antibiotics or that probiotics are effective in prevention of
infection.
 | Since the identification of E. coli 0157:H7 as a food born
pathogen (1982) somewhat coincided with the wide spread adoption of
ionophores in feedlot cattle diets (late 1970s), ionophores have been
implicated as enhancing the establishment of the bacteria in the
intestinal microbial population. Critical evaluation of this concern has
not proved such an association. |
 | None of the probiotics available for cattle in the U.S. have met the
regulatory requirements to demonstrate that they are useful in
protecting the colonization of E. coli 0157:H7 bacteria in
cattle. |
|
 | Fecal contamination of feed ingredients is a major risk factor.
 | Regular cleaning of feed bunks is suggested as a management practice
that will prevent or minimize on-farm multiplication of E. coli 0157:H7. |
|
 | It is hypothesized that nutrient dense, low fiber diets induce a lower
incidence of transmission and(or) shedding of fewer E. coli 0157:H7
cells but do not induce the clearance of the pathogen from the
gastrointestinal tract. Conversely, feeding diets high in fiber and low in
nutrient density, and briefly withholding feed, induce shedding of large
numbers of E. coli 0157:H7 and(or) increase the susceptibility to new
infections. But, both low nutrient density diets and short term feed
withholding induced elimination of the pathogen. This is consistent with in
vitro data indicating E. coli 0157:H7 grows well in rumen fluid from
fasted cattle while its growth is restricted in rumen fluid from well-fed
cattle.
 | Cattle may shed large numbers of E. coli 0157:H7 in their feces
when not fed regularly. |
 | E. coli 0157:H7 isolates grew poorly or their growth was inhibited
in rumen fluid collected from cattle receiving a high-energy diet. |
 | Well-fed cattle are less susceptible to become reservoirs of pathogens
like E. coli 0157:H7. |
 | Rumen fill of cattle per se is not associated with fecal shedding of E.
coli 0157:H7. |
|
The above points underscore the application of common sense sanitation and
bunk management procedures in a feed yard with a quality assurance mindset. It
also underscores the need to think ahead about some of our fertilization and
management practices related to forage grazing and production. The emphasis that
Land O' Lakes Farmland Feed has placed on good bunk management and attention to
detail in feedlot cattle to improve feed efficiency and reduce digestive
disorders can also help provide consumers with a safe, wholesome product.
Reference: Hussein, H. S., S. L. Lake and T. P.
Ringkob. 2001. Review: Cattle as a Reservoir of Shiga-Like Toxin-Producing Escherichia
coli Including 0157:H7 – Pre- and Post Harvest Control Measures to Assure
Beef Safety. ARPAS 17:1.